Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Caterpillar 5-Ton
CaterpillarModel B
Caterpillar 5-Ton
Industrial
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 425 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
CaterpillarCaterpillar 5-Ton
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 5-Ton higher · +252 ci (+146%)DoAll173 ci
5-Ton425 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; 5-Ton is in the 92nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
5-Ton4
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; 5-Ton is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5-Ton higher · +1 (+50%)DoAll2
5-Ton3
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; 5-Ton is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 5-Ton higher · +5,698 lb (+154%)DoAll3,702 lb
5-Ton9,400 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; 5-Ton is in the 84th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)5-Ton (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar 5-Ton | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | DoAll | 5-Ton | — |
| Category | Utility | Industrial | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar 5-Ton | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Caterpillar | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,050RPM | ▲ DoAll+350 RPM · +33% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 425ci | ▲ 5-Ton+252 ci · +146% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.8in | ▲ 5-Ton+1.3 in · +37% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 6in | ▲ 5-Ton+1.5 in · +33% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar 5-Ton | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar 5-Ton | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 124in | ▲ 5-Ton+14 in · +13% |
| Width | 82in | 63in | ▲ DoAll+19 in · +30% |
| Height | 64in | 64in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 9,400lb | ▲ 5-Ton+5,698 lb · +154% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar 5-Ton | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar 5-Ton | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Caterpillar 5-Ton | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 7.5gal | ▲ 5-Ton+2 gal · +36% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 92nd percentile (425 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 84th percentile (9,400 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 33rd percentile (124 in)
A · DoAllB · 5-TonMedian Utility Tractor