Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Challenger MT525B MFWD
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT525B MFWD
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT525B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT525B MFWD higher · +230 ci (+133%)DoAll173 ci
MT525B MFWD403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT525B MFWD higher · +2 (+50%)DoAll4
MT525B MFWD6
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT525B MFWD higher · +7,844 lb (+212%)DoAll3,702 lb
MT525B MFWD11,546 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 89th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ MT525B MFWD higher · +72 in (+65%)DoAll110 in
MT525B MFWD182 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
DoAll is in the 16th percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 91st · 4,659 models
DoAll (A)MT525B MFWD (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | DoAll | MT525B MFWD | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT525B MFWD+800 RPM · +57% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT525B MFWD+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 403ci | ▲ MT525B MFWD+230 ci · +133% |
| Bore | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 182in | ▲ MT525B MFWD+72 in · +65% |
| Width | 82in | 81.6in | ▲ DoAll+0.4 in · <1% |
| Height | 64in | 113in | ▲ MT525B MFWD+49 in · +77% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 11,546lb | ▲ MT525B MFWD+7,844 lb · +212% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 10,915lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 6.8gal | ▲ MT525B MFWD+1.3 gal · +24% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS/FOPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,546 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 91st percentile (182 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 84th percentile (82 in)B · 84th percentile (81.6 in)
A · DoAllB · MT525B MFWDMedian Utility Tractor