CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 3394
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 504 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 3394 vs Challenger MT525B MFWD
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT525B MFWD
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 3394
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT525B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 3394 higher · +101 ci (+25%)3394504 ci
MT525B MFWD403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
3394 is in the 93rd percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied33946
MT525B MFWD6
Median Utility Tractor4
3394 is in the 93rd percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 3394 higher · +4,074 lb (+35%)339415,620 lb
MT525B MFWD11,546 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
3394 is in the 93rd percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 89th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ 3394 higher · +11 in (+6%)3394193 in
MT525B MFWD182 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
3394 is in the 93rd percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 91st · 4,659 models
3394 (A)MT525B MFWD (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 3394 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 3394 | MT525B MFWD | — |
| Category | Utility, Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 3394 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Case | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT525B MFWD+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 504ci | 403ci | ▲ 3394+101 ci · +25% |
| Bore | 4.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 3394 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | partial power shift | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 3394 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 193in | 182in | ▲ 3394+11 in · +6% |
| Width | 60in | 81.6in | ▲ MT525B MFWD+21.6 in · +36% |
| Height | 120in | 113in | ▲ 3394+7 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 15,620lb | 11,546lb | ▲ 3394+4,074 lb · +35% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 3394 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 3394 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 20,500lb | 10,915lb | ▲ 3394+9,585 lb · +88% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 3394 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 3394 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 3394 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 6.8gal | ▲ 3394+4.2 gal · +62% |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 3394 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | ROPS/FOPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 93rd percentile (504 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 93rd percentile (15,620 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,546 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 93rd percentile (193 in)B · 91st percentile (182 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 37th percentile (60 in)B · 84th percentile (81.6 in)
A · 3394B · MT525B MFWDMedian Utility Tractor