Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Challenger MT535
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT535
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT535 higher · +192 ci (+111%)DoAll173 ci
MT535365 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; MT535 is in the 88th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT535 higher · +2 (+50%)DoAll4
MT5356
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; MT535 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT535 higher · +30 (+1500%)DoAll2
MT53532
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; MT535 is in the 97th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT535 higher · +5,898 lb (+159%)DoAll3,702 lb
MT5359,600 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; MT535 is in the 84th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)MT535 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | DoAll | MT535 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3056 | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT535+800 RPM · +57% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT535+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 365ci | ▲ MT535+192 ci · +111% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.9in | ▲ MT535+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ MT535+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 179in | ▲ MT535+69 in · +63% |
| Width | 82in | 88in | ▲ MT535+6 in · +7% |
| Height | 64in | 109in | ▲ MT535+45 in · +70% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 9,600lb | ▲ MT535+5,898 lb · +159% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Optional Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 88th percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 97th percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 84th percentile (9,600 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 90th percentile (179 in)
A · DoAllB · MT535Median Utility Tractor