Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Challenger MT645
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT645
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT645
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT645 higher · +276 ci (+160%)DoAll173 ci
MT645449 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; MT645 is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT645 higher · +2 (+50%)DoAll4
MT6456
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; MT645 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT645 higher · +16 (+800%)DoAll2
MT64518
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; MT645 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT645 higher · +15,318 lb (+414%)DoAll3,702 lb
MT64519,020 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; MT645 is in the 95th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)MT645 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | DoAll | MT645 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Sisu/Valmet Diesel | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT645+800 RPM · +57% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT645+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 449ci | ▲ MT645+276 ci · +160% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.3in | ▲ MT645+0.8 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5.3in | ▲ MT645+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 203in | ▲ MT645+93 in · +85% |
| Width | 82in | 98.2in | ▲ MT645+16.2 in · +20% |
| Height | 64in | 121in | ▲ MT645+57 in · +89% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 19,020lb | ▲ MT645+15,318 lb · +414% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power Steering (Hydrostatic) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power Steering (Hydrostatic) | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric, 12 Volts | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 93rd percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 95th percentile (19,020 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 94th percentile (203 in)
A · DoAllB · MT645Median Utility Tractor