CaseIHModel A
CaseIH MX200 Magnum
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH MX200 Magnum vs Challenger MT645
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT645
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH MX200 Magnum
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT645
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ MX200 Magnum higher · +56 ci (+12%)MX200 Magnum505 ci
MT645449 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
MX200 Magnum is in the 87th percentile; MT645 is in the 77th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMX200 Magnum6
MT6456
Median Row Crop Tractor6
MX200 Magnum is in the 50th percentile; MT645 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMX200 Magnum18
MT64518
Median Row Crop Tractor16
MX200 Magnum is in the 61st percentile; MT645 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ MX200 Magnum higher · +640 lb (+3%)MX200 Magnum19,660 lb
MT64519,020 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
MX200 Magnum is in the 83rd percentile; MT645 is in the 81st · 1,350 models
MX200 Magnum (A)MT645 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH MX200 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | MX200 Magnum | MT645 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH MX200 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | Sisu/Valmet Diesel | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT645+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 449ci | ▲ MX200 Magnum+56 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ MX200 Magnum+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH MX200 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH MX200 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 203in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 98.2in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 121in | — |
| Operating Weight | 19,660lb | 19,020lb | ▲ MX200 Magnum+640 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH MX200 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | PFC | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power Steering (Hydrostatic) | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH MX200 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 11.00-24 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R46 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH MX200 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III, IIIN | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH MX200 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power Steering (Hydrostatic) | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH MX200 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric, 12 Volts | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH MX200 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 77th percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 83rd percentile (19,660 lb)B · 81st percentile (19,020 lb)
A · MX200 MagnumB · MT645Median Row Crop Tractor