Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Cockshutt 1950
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 1950
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 212 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 1950
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 1950 higher · +39 ci (+23%)DoAll173 ci
1950212 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; 1950 is in the 59th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
19504
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; 1950 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1950 higher · +4 (+200%)DoAll2
19506
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; 1950 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1950 higher · +9,273 lb (+250%)DoAll3,702 lb
195012,975 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; 1950 is in the 91st · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)1950 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Cockshutt | — |
| Model | DoAll | 1950 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | General Motors | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Apr-53 | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 1950+1,000 RPM · +71% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 212ci | ▲ 1950+39 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.9in | ▲ 1950+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear & partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 82in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 64in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 12,975lb | ▲ 1950+9,273 lb · +250% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydraulic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydraulic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 1950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 59th percentile (212 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 91st percentile (12,975 lb)
A · DoAllB · 1950Median Utility Tractor