CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1950
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 212 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Row Crop
Cockshutt 1950 vs Zetor 10211
ZetorModel B
Zetor 10211
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 278 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CockshuttCockshutt 1950
vs
ZetorZetor 10211
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 10211 higher · +66 ci (+31%)1950212 ci
10211278 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1950 is in the 10th percentile; 10211 is in the 27th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied19504
102114
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1950 is in the 17th percentile; 10211 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 10211 higher · +10 (+167%)19506
1021116
Median Row Crop Tractor16
1950 is in the 11th percentile; 10211 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1950 higher · +3,175 lb (+32%)195012,975 lb
102119,800 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
1950 is in the 55th percentile; 10211 is in the 31st · 1,350 models
1950 (A)10211 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1950 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Zetor | — |
| Model | 1950 | 10211 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1950 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | General Motors | Zetor | — |
| Model | Apr-53 | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 1950+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 212ci | 278ci | ▲ 10211+66 ci · +31% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 10211+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ 10211+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1950 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear & partial power shift | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1950 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 157in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 76.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 12,975lb | 9,800lb | ▲ 1950+3,175 lb · +32% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1950 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Cockshutt 1950 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 7.50-20 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1950 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1950 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1950 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1950 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.8gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 10th percentile (212 ci)B · 27th percentile (278 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 11th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 55th percentile (12,975 lb)B · 31st percentile (9,800 lb)
A · 1950B · 10211Median Row Crop Tractor