Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Deutz-Allis 8050
Image not recorded
Deutz-AllisModel B
Deutz-Allis 8050
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 426 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 20
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
Deutz-AllisDeutz-Allis 8050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 8050 higher · +253 ci (+146%)DoAll173 ci
8050426 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; 8050 is in the 92nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 8050 higher · +2 (+50%)DoAll4
80506
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; 8050 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8050 higher · +18 (+900%)DoAll2
805020
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; 8050 is in the 86th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 8050 higher · +11,603 lb (+313%)DoAll3,702 lb
805015,305 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; 8050 is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)8050 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Deutz-Allis 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Deutz-Allis | — |
| Model | DoAll | 8050 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Deutz-Allis 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Allis Chalmers | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 670I | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 8050+900 RPM · +64% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 8050+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 426ci | ▲ 8050+253 ci · +146% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.3in | ▲ 8050+0.8 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 8050+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Deutz-Allis 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | 20-speed partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Deutz-Allis 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 187in | ▲ 8050+77 in · +70% |
| Width | 82in | 95.5in | ▲ 8050+13.5 in · +16% |
| Height | 64in | 115in | ▲ 8050+51 in · +80% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 15,305lb | ▲ 8050+11,603 lb · +313% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Deutz-Allis 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed-center load-sensitive | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Deutz-Allis 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Deutz-Allis 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Deutz-Allis 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric Starter (12V) | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Deutz-Allis 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 8gal | ▲ 8050+2.5 gal · +45% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Deutz-Allis 8050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 92nd percentile (426 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 86th percentile (20)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 93rd percentile (15,305 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 92nd percentile (187 in)
A · DoAllB · 8050Median Utility Tractor