Head to head · Utility

Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Ford Commander 6000

Advance-Rumely DoAll Tractor
Advance-RumelyModel A

Advance-Rumely DoAll

Utility

power
Not recorded
displacement
173 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
2
Full DoAll specs
Image not recorded
FordModel B

Ford Commander 6000

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
242 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full Commander 6000 specs
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
FordFord Commander 6000

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Displacement

▲ Commander 6000 higher · +69 ci (+40%)
DoAll173 ci
Commander 6000242 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

DoAll is in the 46th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 67th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ Commander 6000 higher · +2 (+50%)
DoAll4
Commander 60006
Median Utility Tractor4

DoAll is in the 50th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ Commander 6000 higher · +8 (+400%)
DoAll2
Commander 600010
Median Utility Tractor12

DoAll is in the 1st percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 39th · 4,941 models

Operating Weight

▲ Commander 6000 higher · +3,428 lb (+93%)
DoAll3,702 lb
Commander 60007,130 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 68th · 5,107 models

DoAll (A)Commander 6000 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAdvance-Rumely DoAllFord Commander 6000Difference
ManufacturerAdvance-RumelyFord—
ModelDoAllCommander 6000—
CategoryUtilityRow Crop—

Engine

SpecAdvance-Rumely DoAllFord Commander 6000Difference
ManufacturerWaukeshaFord—
Rated RPM1,400RPM2,430RPM▲ Commander 6000+1,030 RPM · +74%
Cylinders46▲ Commander 6000+2 · +50%
Displacement173ci242ci▲ Commander 6000+69 ci · +40%
Bore3.5in3.6in▲ Commander 6000+0.1 in · +3%
Stroke4.5in3.9in▲ DoAll+0.6 in · +15%

Transmission

SpecAdvance-Rumely DoAllFord Commander 6000Difference
TypeGearFull power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAdvance-Rumely DoAllFord Commander 6000Difference
Length110in142in▲ Commander 6000+32 in · +29%
Width82in71.5in▲ DoAll+10.5 in · +15%
Height64in78.2in▲ Commander 6000+14.2 in · +22%
Operating Weight3,702lb7,130lb▲ Commander 6000+3,428 lb · +93%

Hydraulics

SpecAdvance-Rumely DoAllFord Commander 6000Difference
Steering TypeManualPower—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecAdvance-Rumely DoAllFord Commander 6000Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAdvance-Rumely DoAllFord Commander 6000Difference
Hitch CategoryNot recordedII/I—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAdvance-Rumely DoAllFord Commander 6000Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x2 2WDSame
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeManualPower—
Brake TypeNot recordedDifferential hydraulic wet disc—

Electrical

SpecAdvance-Rumely DoAllFord Commander 6000Difference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Capacities

SpecAdvance-Rumely DoAllFord Commander 6000Difference
Coolant5.5gal3.9gal▲ DoAll+1.6 gal · +41%

Operator Station

SpecAdvance-Rumely DoAllFord Commander 6000Difference
TypeNot recordedOpen operator station—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 67th percentile (242 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 1st percentile (2)B · 39th percentile (10)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 68th percentile (7,130 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 57th percentile (142 in)
A · DoAllB · Commander 6000Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageAdvance-Rumely DoAllFull spec pageFord Commander 6000