Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Hesston 766
Image not recorded
HesstonModel B
Hesston 766
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 224 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
HesstonHesston 766
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 766 higher · +51 ci (+29%)DoAll173 ci
766224 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; 766 is in the 61st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
7664
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; 766 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 766 higher · +10 (+500%)DoAll2
76612
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; 766 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 766 higher · +2,098 lb (+57%)DoAll3,702 lb
7665,800 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; 766 is in the 55th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)766 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Hesston 766 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Hesston | — |
| Model | DoAll | 766 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Hesston 766 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Fiat | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 766+1,100 RPM · +79% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 224ci | ▲ 766+51 ci · +29% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.1in | ▲ 766+0.5 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ DoAll+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Hesston 766 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Hesston 766 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 82in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 64in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 5,800lb | ▲ 766+2,098 lb · +57% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Hesston 766 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Hesston 766 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Hesston 766 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Hesston 766 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Hesston 766 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 61st percentile (224 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 55th percentile (5,800 lb)
A · DoAllB · 766Median Utility Tractor