Image not recorded
HesstonModel A
Hesston 766
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 224 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Hesston 766 vs Kubota M95S
KubotaModel B
Kubota M95S
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 32
HesstonHesston 766
vs
KubotaKubota M95S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ M95S higher · +6 ci (+3%)766224 ci
M95S230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
766 is in the 61st percentile; M95S is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied7664
M95S4
Median Utility Tractor4
766 is in the 50th percentile; M95S is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ M95S higher · +20 (+167%)76612
M95S32
Median Utility Tractor12
766 is in the 50th percentile; M95S is in the 97th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ M95S higher · +461 lb (+8%)7665,800 lb
M95S6,261 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
766 is in the 55th percentile; M95S is in the 59th · 5,107 models
766 (A)M95S (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Hesston 766 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Hesston | Kubota | — |
| Model | 766 | M95S | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Hesston 766 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | V3800-DI-T | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ M95S+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 224ci | 230ci | ▲ M95S+6 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ 766+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.7in | ▲ M95S+0.4 in · +9% |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Hesston 766 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 162in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 79in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 106in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,800lb | 6,261lb | ▲ M95S+461 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Hesston 766 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Hesston 766 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Hesston 766 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Hesston 766 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Hesston 766 | Kubota M95S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 61st percentile (224 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 97th percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 55th percentile (5,800 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,261 lb)
A · 766B · M95SMedian Utility Tractor