Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Massey-Harris Challenger
Massey-HarrisModel B
Massey-Harris Challenger
Standard Tread
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris Challenger
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger higher · +75 ci (+43%)DoAll173 ci
Challenger248 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; Challenger is in the 69th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
Challenger4
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; Challenger is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Challenger higher · +2 (+100%)DoAll2
Challenger4
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; Challenger is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ Challenger higher · +498 lb (+13%)DoAll3,702 lb
Challenger4,200 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; Challenger is in the 40th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)Challenger (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | DoAll | Challenger | — |
| Category | Utility | Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Massey-Harris | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,200RPM | ▲ DoAll+200 RPM · +17% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 248ci | ▲ Challenger+75 ci · +43% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.9in | ▲ Challenger+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5.3in | ▲ Challenger+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 129in | ▲ Challenger+19 in · +17% |
| Width | 82in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 64in | 58in | ▲ DoAll+6 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 4,200lb | ▲ Challenger+498 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 5gal | ▲ DoAll+0.5 gal · +10% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 69th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 40th percentile (4,200 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 40th percentile (129 in)
A · DoAllB · ChallengerMedian Utility Tractor