
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility

Utility

Standard Tread
How they compare
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; TD-40 is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; TD-40 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; TD-40 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; TD-40 is in the 90th · 5,107 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering TD-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | McCormick-Deering | — |
| Model | DoAll | TD-40 | — |
| Category | Utility | Standard Tread | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering TD-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | International Harvester | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,200RPM | ▲ DoAll+200 RPM · +17% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 461ci | ▲ TD-40+288 ci · +166% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.8in | ▲ TD-40+1.3 in · +37% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 6.5in | ▲ TD-40+2 in · +44% |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering TD-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering TD-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 140in | ▲ TD-40+30 in · +27% |
| Width | 82in | 63.8in | ▲ DoAll+18.2 in · +29% |
| Height | 64in | 82.5in | ▲ TD-40+18.5 in · +29% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 12,080lb | ▲ TD-40+8,378 lb · +226% |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering TD-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering TD-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering TD-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 15gal | ▲ TD-40+9.5 gal · +173% |
Category context