Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs McCormick-Deering W-40
Image not recorded
McCormick-DeeringModel B
McCormick-Deering W-40
Standard Tread
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 298 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 4
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering W-40
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ W-40 higher · +125 ci (+72%)DoAll173 ci
W-40298 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; W-40 is in the 84th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ W-40 higher · +2 (+50%)DoAll4
W-406
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; W-40 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ W-40 higher · +2 (+100%)DoAll2
W-404
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; W-40 is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ W-40 higher · +2,398 lb (+65%)DoAll3,702 lb
W-406,100 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; W-40 is in the 58th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)W-40 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering W-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | McCormick-Deering | — |
| Model | DoAll | W-40 | — |
| Category | Utility | Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering W-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | International Harvester | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,750RPM | ▲ W-40+350 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ W-40+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 298ci | ▲ W-40+125 ci · +72% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.8in | ▲ W-40+0.3 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering W-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsyncronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering W-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 142in | ▲ W-40+32 in · +29% |
| Width | 82in | 65.8in | ▲ DoAll+16.2 in · +25% |
| Height | 64in | 73in | ▲ W-40+9 in · +14% |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 6,100lb | ▲ W-40+2,398 lb · +65% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering W-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering W-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering W-40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 12gal | ▲ W-40+6.5 gal · +118% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 84th percentile (298 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 58th percentile (6,100 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 57th percentile (142 in)
A · DoAllB · W-40Median Utility Tractor