Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs McCormick-Deering WD-9
Image not recorded
McCormick-DeeringModel B
McCormick-Deering WD-9
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 335 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering WD-9
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ WD-9 higher · +162 ci (+94%)DoAll173 ci
WD-9335 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; WD-9 is in the 86th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
WD-94
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; WD-9 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ WD-9 higher · +3 (+150%)DoAll2
WD-95
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; WD-9 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ WD-9 higher · +2,948 lb (+80%)DoAll3,702 lb
WD-96,650 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; WD-9 is in the 63rd · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)WD-9 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | McCormick-Deering | — |
| Model | DoAll | WD-9 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | International Harvester | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ WD-9+100 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 335ci | ▲ WD-9+162 ci · +94% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.4in | ▲ WD-9+0.9 in · +26% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5.5in | ▲ WD-9+1 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 134in | ▲ WD-9+24 in · +22% |
| Width | 82in | 68in | ▲ DoAll+14 in · +21% |
| Height | 64in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 6,650lb | ▲ WD-9+2,948 lb · +80% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | McCormick-Deering WD-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 11gal | ▲ WD-9+5.5 gal · +100% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 86th percentile (335 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 63rd percentile (6,650 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 46th percentile (134 in)
A · DoAllB · WD-9Median Utility Tractor