Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 1,884 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 vs Challenger MT535
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT535
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull B 25/45 higher · +1,519 ci (+416%)OilPull B 25/451,884 ci
MT535365 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
OilPull B 25/45 is in the 99th percentile; MT535 is in the 56th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT535 higher · +4 (+200%)OilPull B 25/452
MT5356
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
OilPull B 25/45 is in the 3rd percentile; MT535 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ OilPull B 25/45 higher · +15,400 lb (+160%)OilPull B 25/4525,000 lb
MT5359,600 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
OilPull B 25/45 is in the 92nd percentile; MT535 is in the 42nd · 971 models
OilPull B 25/45 (A)MT535 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | OilPull B 25/45 | MT535 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumley | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3056 | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 6 | ▲ MT535+4 · +200% |
| Displacement | 1,884ci | 365ci | ▲ OilPull B 25/45+1,519 ci · +416% |
| Bore | 9.5in | 3.9in | ▲ OilPull B 25/45+5.6 in · +144% |
| Stroke | 12in | 5in | ▲ OilPull B 25/45+7 in · +140% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 179in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 88in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 109in | — |
| Operating Weight | 25,000lb | 9,600lb | ▲ OilPull B 25/45+15,400 lb · +160% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull B 25/45 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Optional Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 99th percentile (1,884 ci)B · 56th percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 92nd percentile (25,000 lb)B · 42nd percentile (9,600 lb)
A · OilPull B 25/45B · MT535Median Agricultural Tractor