Head to head · Agricultural

Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 vs Ford Commander 6000

Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A

Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60

Agricultural

power
Not recorded
displacement
1,885 ci
Cylinders
2
Forward gears
1
Full OilPull E 30/60 specs
Image not recorded
FordModel B

Ford Commander 6000

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
242 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full Commander 6000 specs
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60
vs
FordFord Commander 6000

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 497–1,130

Engine Displacement

▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +1,643 ci (+679%)
OilPull E 30/601,885 ci
Commander 6000242 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 99th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 24th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ Commander 6000 higher · +4 (+200%)
OilPull E 30/602
Commander 60006
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 3rd percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ Commander 6000 higher · +9 (+900%)
OilPull E 30/601
Commander 600010
Median Agricultural Tractor16

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 1st percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 23rd · 972 models

Operating Weight

▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +19,170 lb (+269%)
OilPull E 30/6026,300 lb
Commander 60007,130 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 93rd percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 25th · 971 models

OilPull E 30/60 (A)Commander 6000 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford Commander 6000Difference
ManufacturerAdvance-RumelyFord—
ModelOilPull E 30/60Commander 6000—
CategoryAgriculturalRow Crop—

Engine

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford Commander 6000Difference
ManufacturerRumleyFord—
Rated RPMNot recorded2,430RPM—
Cylinders26▲ Commander 6000+4 · +200%
Displacement1,885ci242ci▲ OilPull E 30/60+1,643 ci · +679%
Bore10in3.6in▲ OilPull E 30/60+6.4 in · +178%
Stroke12in3.9in▲ OilPull E 30/60+8.1 in · +208%

Transmission

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford Commander 6000Difference
TypeGearFull power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford Commander 6000Difference
Length228in142in▲ OilPull E 30/60+86 in · +61%
Width116in71.5in▲ OilPull E 30/60+44.5 in · +62%
Height132in78.2in▲ OilPull E 30/60+53.8 in · +69%
Operating Weight26,300lb7,130lb▲ OilPull E 30/60+19,170 lb · +269%

Hydraulics

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford Commander 6000Difference
Steering TypeManualPower—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford Commander 6000Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford Commander 6000Difference
Hitch CategoryNot recordedII/I—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford Commander 6000Difference
Chassis Type4x24x2 2WD—
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeManualPower—
Brake TypeNot recordedDifferential hydraulic wet disc—

Electrical

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford Commander 6000Difference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Capacities

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford Commander 6000Difference
Coolant70gal3.9gal▲ OilPull E 30/60+66.1 gal · +1695%

Operator Station

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford Commander 6000Difference
TypeNot recordedOpen operator station—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 99th percentile (1,885 ci)B · 24th percentile (242 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 1st percentile (1)B · 23rd percentile (10)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 93rd percentile (26,300 lb)B · 25th percentile (7,130 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 92nd percentile (228 in)B · 21st percentile (142 in)
A · OilPull E 30/60B · Commander 6000Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Full spec pageFord Commander 6000