Head to head · Agricultural

Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 vs McCormick-Deering WD-9

Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A

Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60

Agricultural

power
Not recorded
displacement
1,885 ci
Cylinders
2
Forward gears
1
Full OilPull E 30/60 specs
Image not recorded
McCormick-DeeringModel B

McCormick-Deering WD-9

Utility

power
Not recorded
displacement
335 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
5
Full WD-9 specs
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60
vs
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering WD-9

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 4971,130

Engine Displacement

▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +1,550 ci (+463%)
OilPull E 30/601,885 ci
WD-9335 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 99th percentile; WD-9 is in the 50th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ WD-9 higher · +2 (+100%)
OilPull E 30/602
WD-94
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 3rd percentile; WD-9 is in the 31st · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ WD-9 higher · +4 (+400%)
OilPull E 30/601
WD-95
Median Agricultural Tractor16

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 1st percentile; WD-9 is in the 7th · 972 models

Operating Weight

▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +19,650 lb (+295%)
OilPull E 30/6026,300 lb
WD-96,650 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 93rd percentile; WD-9 is in the 23rd · 971 models

OilPull E 30/60 (A)WD-9 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60McCormick-Deering WD-9Difference
ManufacturerAdvance-RumelyMcCormick-Deering
ModelOilPull E 30/60WD-9
CategoryAgriculturalUtility, Standard Tread

Engine

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60McCormick-Deering WD-9Difference
ManufacturerRumleyInternational Harvester
Rated RPMNot recorded1,500RPM
Cylinders24WD-9+2 · +100%
Displacement1,885ci335ciOilPull E 30/60+1,550 ci · +463%
Bore10in4.4inOilPull E 30/60+5.6 in · +127%
Stroke12in5.5inOilPull E 30/60+6.5 in · +118%

Transmission

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60McCormick-Deering WD-9Difference
TypeGearGearSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60McCormick-Deering WD-9Difference
Length228in134inOilPull E 30/60+94 in · +70%
Width116in68inOilPull E 30/60+48 in · +71%
Height132inNot recorded
Operating Weight26,300lb6,650lbOilPull E 30/60+19,650 lb · +295%

Hydraulics

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60McCormick-Deering WD-9Difference
Steering TypeManualManualSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60McCormick-Deering WD-9Difference
Chassis Type4x24x2 2WD
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeManualManualSame

Capacities

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60McCormick-Deering WD-9Difference
Coolant70gal11galOilPull E 30/60+59 gal · +536%

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 99th percentile (1,885 ci)B · 50th percentile (335 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 31st percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 1st percentile (1)B · 7th percentile (5)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 93rd percentile (26,300 lb)B · 23rd percentile (6,650 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 92nd percentile (228 in)B · 16th percentile (134 in)
A · OilPull E 30/60B · WD-9Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Full spec pageMcCormick-Deering WD-9