Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 1,885 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 1
Head to head · Agricultural
Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 vs Minneapolis-Moline RTU
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline RTU
Lawn and Garden
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline RTU
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +1,720 ci (+1042%)OilPull E 30/601,885 ci
RTU165 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 99th percentile; RTU is in the 9th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ RTU higher · +2 (+100%)OilPull E 30/602
RTU4
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 3rd percentile; RTU is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ RTU higher · +3 (+300%)OilPull E 30/601
RTU4
Median Agricultural Tractor16
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 1st percentile; RTU is in the 3rd · 972 models
Operating Weight
▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +23,200 lb (+748%)OilPull E 30/6026,300 lb
RTU3,100 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
OilPull E 30/60 is in the 93rd percentile; RTU is in the 2nd · 971 models
OilPull E 30/60 (A)RTU (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | OilPull E 30/60 | RTU | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumley | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ RTU+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 1,885ci | 165ci | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+1,720 ci · +1042% |
| Bore | 10in | 3.6in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+6.4 in · +178% |
| Stroke | 12in | 4in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+8 in · +200% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 228in | 116in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+112 in · +97% |
| Width | 116in | 81.1in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+34.9 in · +43% |
| Height | 132in | 68.5in | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+63.5 in · +93% |
| Operating Weight | 26,300lb | 3,100lb | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+23,200 lb · +748% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 70gal | 3.4gal | ▲ OilPull E 30/60+66.6 gal · +1959% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 99th percentile (1,885 ci)B · 9th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 31st percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 1st percentile (1)B · 3rd percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (26,300 lb)B · 2nd percentile (3,100 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 92nd percentile (228 in)B · 5th percentile (116 in)
A · OilPull E 30/60B · RTUMedian Agricultural Tractor