Massey-HarrisModel A
Massey-Harris 102 Junior
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 162 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Utility
Massey-Harris 102 Junior vs Minneapolis-Moline RTU
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline RTU
Lawn and Garden
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris 102 Junior
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline RTU
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ RTU higher · +3 ci (+2%)102 Junior162 ci
RTU165 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
102 Junior is in the 43rd percentile; RTU is in the 44th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied102 Junior4
RTU4
Median Utility Tractor4
102 Junior is in the 50th percentile; RTU is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied102 Junior4
RTU4
Median Utility Tractor12
102 Junior is in the 4th percentile; RTU is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 102 Junior higher · +300 lb (+10%)102 Junior3,400 lb
RTU3,100 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
102 Junior is in the 28th percentile; RTU is in the 24th · 5,107 models
102 Junior (A)RTU (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey-Harris | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | 102 Junior | RTU | — |
| Category | Utility | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Continental | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ 102 Junior+300 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 162ci | 165ci | ▲ RTU+3 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.6in | ▲ RTU+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 4in | ▲ 102 Junior+0.4 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 116in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 81.1in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 68.5in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,400lb | 3,100lb | ▲ 102 Junior+300 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.4gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 43rd percentile (162 ci)B · 44th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)B · 24th percentile (3,100 lb)
A · 102 JuniorB · RTUMedian Utility Tractor