Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 943 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Challenger MT525B MFWD
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT525B MFWD
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT525B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +540 ci (+134%)OilPull F 15/30943 ci
MT525B MFWD403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT525B MFWD higher · +5 (+500%)OilPull F 15/301
MT525B MFWD6
Median Utility Tractor4
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +4,954 lb (+43%)OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
MT525B MFWD11,546 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 94th percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 89th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +10 in (+5%)OilPull F 15/30192 in
MT525B MFWD182 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 93rd percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 91st · 4,659 models
OilPull F 15/30 (A)MT525B MFWD (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | OilPull F 15/30 | MT525B MFWD | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumely | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 1 | 6 | ▲ MT525B MFWD+5 · +500% |
| Displacement | 943ci | 403ci | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+540 ci · +134% |
| Bore | 10in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 12in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192in | 182in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+10 in · +5% |
| Width | 94in | 81.6in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+12.4 in · +15% |
| Height | 124in | 113in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+11 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | 11,546lb | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+4,954 lb · +43% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 10,915lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS/FOPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 99th percentile (943 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 1st percentile (1)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,546 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 93rd percentile (192 in)B · 91st percentile (182 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 93rd percentile (94 in)B · 84th percentile (81.6 in)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · MT525B MFWDMedian Utility Tractor