Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 943 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Challenger MT535
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT535
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +578 ci (+158%)OilPull F 15/30943 ci
MT535365 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; MT535 is in the 88th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT535 higher · +5 (+500%)OilPull F 15/301
MT5356
Median Utility Tractor4
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; MT535 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT535 higher · +30 (+1500%)OilPull F 15/302
MT53532
Median Utility Tractor12
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; MT535 is in the 97th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +6,900 lb (+72%)OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
MT5359,600 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 94th percentile; MT535 is in the 84th · 5,107 models
OilPull F 15/30 (A)MT535 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | OilPull F 15/30 | MT535 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumely | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3056 | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 1 | 6 | ▲ MT535+5 · +500% |
| Displacement | 943ci | 365ci | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+578 ci · +158% |
| Bore | 10in | 3.9in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+6.1 in · +156% |
| Stroke | 12in | 5in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+7 in · +140% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192in | 179in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+13 in · +7% |
| Width | 94in | 88in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+6 in · +7% |
| Height | 124in | 109in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+15 in · +14% |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | 9,600lb | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+6,900 lb · +72% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Optional Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 99th percentile (943 ci)B · 88th percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 1st percentile (1)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 97th percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 84th percentile (9,600 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 93rd percentile (192 in)B · 90th percentile (179 in)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · MT535Median Utility Tractor