Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 943 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Utility
Row Crop
How they compare
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; Row Crop 18-27 is in the 82nd · 5,580 models
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; Row Crop 18-27 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; Row Crop 18-27 is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 94th percentile; Row Crop 18-27 is in the 29th · 5,107 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Hart-Parr Row Crop 18-27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Hart-Parr | — |
| Model | OilPull F 15/30 | Row Crop 18-27 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Row Crop | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Hart-Parr Row Crop 18-27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumely | Oliver | — |
| Cylinders | 1 | 4 | ▲ Row Crop 18-27+3 · +300% |
| Displacement | 943ci | 281ci | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+662 ci · +236% |
| Bore | 10in | 4.1in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+5.9 in · +144% |
| Stroke | 12in | 5.3in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+6.7 in · +126% |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Hart-Parr Row Crop 18-27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Hart-Parr Row Crop 18-27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192in | 125in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+67 in · +54% |
| Width | 94in | 80in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+14 in · +18% |
| Height | 124in | 64in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+60 in · +94% |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | 3,500lb | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+13,000 lb · +371% |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Hart-Parr Row Crop 18-27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Hart-Parr Row Crop 18-27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
Category context