Head to head · Standard Tread

Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Massey-Harris Challenger

Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A

Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30

Utility

power
Not recorded
displacement
943 ci
Cylinders
1
Forward gears
2
Full OilPull F 15/30 specs
Massey-Harris Challenger Tractor
Massey-HarrisModel B

Massey-Harris Challenger

Standard Tread

power
Not recorded
displacement
248 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
4
Full Challenger specs
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris Challenger

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Standard Tread

n = 234367

Engine Displacement

▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +695 ci (+280%)
OilPull F 15/30943 ci
Challenger248 ci
Median Standard Tread Tractor382 ci

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 92nd percentile; Challenger is in the 20th · 353 models

Cylinders

▲ Challenger higher · +3 (+300%)
OilPull F 15/301
Challenger4
Median Standard Tread Tractor4

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 7th percentile; Challenger is in the 50th · 367 models

Forward Gears

▲ Challenger higher · +2 (+100%)
OilPull F 15/302
Challenger4
Median Standard Tread Tractor4

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 19th percentile; Challenger is in the 50th · 341 models

Operating Weight

▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +12,300 lb (+293%)
OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
Challenger4,200 lb
Median Standard Tread Tractor6,834 lb

OilPull F 15/30 is in the 90th percentile; Challenger is in the 16th · 297 models

OilPull F 15/30 (A)Challenger (B)Median Standard Tread Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Massey-Harris ChallengerDifference
ManufacturerAdvance-RumelyMassey-Harris
ModelOilPull F 15/30Challenger
CategoryUtility, Standard TreadStandard Tread

Engine

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Massey-Harris ChallengerDifference
ManufacturerRumelyMassey-Harris
Rated RPMNot recorded1,200RPM
Cylinders14Challenger+3 · +300%
Displacement943ci248ciOilPull F 15/30+695 ci · +280%
Bore10in3.9inOilPull F 15/30+6.1 in · +156%
Stroke12in5.3inOilPull F 15/30+6.7 in · +126%

Transmission

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Massey-Harris ChallengerDifference
TypeGearGearSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Massey-Harris ChallengerDifference
Length192in129inOilPull F 15/30+63 in · +49%
Width94inNot recorded
Height124in58inOilPull F 15/30+66 in · +114%
Operating Weight16,500lb4,200lbOilPull F 15/30+12,300 lb · +293%

Hydraulics

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Massey-Harris ChallengerDifference
Steering TypeNot recordedManual

Chassis & Drive

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Massey-Harris ChallengerDifference
Chassis Type4x2 2WDNot recorded
Drive Type2WDNot recorded
Steering TypeNot recordedManual

Capacities

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Massey-Harris ChallengerDifference
CoolantNot recorded5gal

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 382 ci
A · 92nd percentile (943 ci)B · 20th percentile (248 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 7th percentile (1)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 4
A · 19th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (4)

Operating Weight

median 6,834 lb
A · 90th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 16th percentile (4,200 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 94th percentile (192 in)B · 29th percentile (129 in)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · ChallengerMedian Standard Tread Tractor
Full spec pageAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30Full spec pageMassey-Harris Challenger