Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 943 ci
- Cylinders
- 1
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 vs Minneapolis-Moline RTU
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline RTU
Lawn and Garden
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline RTU
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +778 ci (+472%)OilPull F 15/30943 ci
RTU165 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 99th percentile; RTU is in the 44th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ RTU higher · +3 (+300%)OilPull F 15/301
RTU4
Median Utility Tractor4
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; RTU is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ RTU higher · +2 (+100%)OilPull F 15/302
RTU4
Median Utility Tractor12
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 1st percentile; RTU is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ OilPull F 15/30 higher · +13,400 lb (+432%)OilPull F 15/3016,500 lb
RTU3,100 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
OilPull F 15/30 is in the 94th percentile; RTU is in the 24th · 5,107 models
OilPull F 15/30 (A)RTU (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | OilPull F 15/30 | RTU | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rumely | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 1 | 4 | ▲ RTU+3 · +300% |
| Displacement | 943ci | 165ci | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+778 ci · +472% |
| Bore | 10in | 3.6in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+6.4 in · +178% |
| Stroke | 12in | 4in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+8 in · +200% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 192in | 116in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+76 in · +66% |
| Width | 94in | 81.1in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+12.9 in · +16% |
| Height | 124in | 68.5in | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+55.5 in · +81% |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | 3,100lb | ▲ OilPull F 15/30+13,400 lb · +432% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely OilPull F 15/30 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.4gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 99th percentile (943 ci)B · 44th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 1st percentile (1)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 24th percentile (3,100 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 93rd percentile (192 in)B · 22nd percentile (116 in)
A · OilPull F 15/30B · RTUMedian Utility Tractor