Head to head · Sub-Compact

Ag King AK2840 vs Challenger MT225

Image not recorded
Ag KingModel A

Ag King AK2840

Sub-Compact

power
24 hp
displacement
93.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
6
Full AK2840 specs
Challenger MT225 Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT225

Utility

power
23.3 hp
displacement
68.5 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT225 specs
Ag KingAg King AK2840
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT225

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 584–816

Engine Power

▲ AK2840 higher · +0.7 hp (+3%)
AK284024 hp
MT22523.3 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

AK2840 is in the 39th percentile; MT225 is in the 38th · 816 models

Engine Displacement

▲ AK2840 higher · +24.9 ci (+36%)
AK284093.4 ci
MT22568.5 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci

AK2840 is in the 53rd percentile; MT225 is in the 29th · 757 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
AK28403
MT2253
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3

AK2840 is in the 50th percentile; MT225 is in the 50th · 802 models

Operating Weight

▲ AK2840 higher · +1,228 lb (+73%)
AK28402,900 lb
MT2251,672 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb

AK2840 is in the 54th percentile; MT225 is in the 29th · 711 models

AK2840 (A)MT225 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAg King AK2840Challenger MT225Difference
ManufacturerAg KingChallenger—
ModelAK2840MT225—
CategorySub-CompactUtility—

Engine

SpecAg King AK2840Challenger MT225Difference
ManufacturerNot recordedIseki—
Power Output24hp23.3hp▲ AK2840+0.7 hp · +3%
Rated RPM2,350RPM2,800RPM▲ MT225+450 RPM · +19%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement93.4ci68.5ci▲ AK2840+24.9 ci · +36%
BoreNot recorded3.1in—
StrokeNot recorded3.1in—

Transmission

SpecAg King AK2840Challenger MT225Difference
TypeManualHydrostatic—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAg King AK2840Challenger MT225Difference
Length118in105in▲ AK2840+13 in · +12%
Width57in41in▲ AK2840+16 in · +39%
Height87in75.2in▲ AK2840+11.8 in · +16%
Operating Weight2,900lb1,672lb▲ AK2840+1,228 lb · +73%

Hydraulics

SpecAg King AK2840Challenger MT225Difference
System TypeNot recordedOpen Center—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower steering—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAg King AK2840Challenger MT225Difference
Hitch TypeCategory 3Category I—
Hitch CategoryI1—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch CapacityNot recorded694lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAg King AK2840Challenger MT225Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower steering—

Electrical

SpecAg King AK2840Challenger MT225Difference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric Starter—

Capacities

SpecAg King AK2840Challenger MT225Difference
Coolant2.6galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecAg King AK2840Challenger MT225Difference
TypeNot recordedOpen—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 39th percentile (24 hp)B · 38th percentile (23.3 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 91.4 ci
A · 53rd percentile (93.4 ci)B · 29th percentile (68.5 ci)

Cylinders

median 3
A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 2,700 lb
A · 54th percentile (2,900 lb)B · 29th percentile (1,672 lb)

Length

median 113 in
A · 57th percentile (118 in)B · 38th percentile (105 in)
A · AK2840B · MT225Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageAg King AK2840Full spec pageChallenger MT225