Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT160 vs Ford TW-20
AGCOAGCO DT160
vs
FordFord TW-20
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ DT160 higher · +3 hp (+2%)DT160160 hp
TW-20157 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT160 is in the 62nd percentile; TW-20 is in the 61st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT160 higher · +104 ci (+26%)DT160505 ci
TW-20401 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT160 is in the 89th percentile; TW-20 is in the 51st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT1606
TW-206
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT160 is in the 50th percentile; TW-20 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ DT160 higher · +2 (+13%)DT16018
TW-2016
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT160 is in the 61st percentile; TW-20 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
DT160 (A)TW-20 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ford TW-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Ford | — |
| Model | DT160 | TW-20 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ford TW-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Ford | — |
| Model | C8.3 | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 160hp | 157hp | ▲ DT160+3 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 401ci | ▲ DT160+104 ci · +26% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.4in | ▲ DT160+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 4.4in | ▲ DT160+0.9 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ford TW-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Two-speed power shift with cerametallic disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ford TW-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | 176in | ▲ DT160+27 in · +15% |
| Width | 98.2in | 104in | ▲ TW-20+5.8 in · +6% |
| Height | 121in | 113in | ▲ DT160+8 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 18,500lb | 12,249lb | ▲ DT160+6,251 lb · +51% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ford TW-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ford TW-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Independent | Same |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | 1,000rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ford TW-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 16,000lb | 5,700lb | ▲ DT160+10,300 lb · +181% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ford TW-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Differential hydraulic wet discs | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ford TW-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ford TW-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 5.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT160 | Ford TW-20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 62nd percentile (160 hp)B · 61st percentile (157 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 51st percentile (401 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 80th percentile (18,500 lb)B · 50th percentile (12,249 lb)
A · DT160B · TW-20Median Row Crop Tractor