Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT180 vs Challenger MT635B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT635B
Agricultural
- power
- 215 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO DT180
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT635B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedDT180215 hp
MT635B215 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT180 is in the 80th percentile; MT635B is in the 80th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT180 higher · +56 ci (+12%)DT180505 ci
MT635B449 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT180 is in the 89th percentile; MT635B is in the 77th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT1806
MT635B6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT180 is in the 50th percentile; MT635B is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT635B higher · +1,095 lb (+6%)DT18018,500 lb
MT635B19,595 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
DT180 is in the 80th percentile; MT635B is in the 83rd · 1,350 models
DT180 (A)MT635B (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | Challenger MT635B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | DT180 | MT635B | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | Challenger MT635B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Sisu | — |
| Model | C8.3L | 74ETA | — |
| Power Output | 215hp | 215hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 449ci | ▲ DT180+56 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ DT180+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | Challenger MT635B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | Challenger MT635B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | 206in | ▲ MT635B+3 in · +1% |
| Width | 98.2in | 118in | ▲ MT635B+19.8 in · +20% |
| Height | 121in | 124in | ▲ MT635B+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 18,500lb | 19,595lb | ▲ MT635B+1,095 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | Challenger MT635B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | Challenger MT635B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | Challenger MT635B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/IIIN | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 18,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | Challenger MT635B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | Challenger MT635B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | Challenger MT635B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 8.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | Challenger MT635B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab standard | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 80th percentile (215 hp)B · 80th percentile (215 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 77th percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 80th percentile (18,500 lb)B · 83rd percentile (19,595 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 78th percentile (203 in)B · 82nd percentile (206 in)
A · DT180B · MT635BMedian Row Crop Tractor