Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT200 vs Challenger MT575E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT575E
Agricultural
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO DT200
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT575E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ MT575E higher · +5 hp (+2%)DT200235 hp
MT575E240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT200 is in the 85th percentile; MT575E is in the 86th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT200 higher · +56 ci (+12%)DT200505 ci
MT575E449 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT200 is in the 89th percentile; MT575E is in the 77th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT2006
MT575E6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT200 is in the 50th percentile; MT575E is in the 50th · 1,417 models
DT200 (A)MT575E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | DT200 | MT575E | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | C8.3 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 240hp | ▲ MT575E+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ DT200+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 449ci | ▲ DT200+56 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ DT200+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 98in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 121in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 19,700lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Closed-center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab Standard | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 85th percentile (235 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 77th percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
A · DT200B · MT575EMedian Row Crop Tractor