ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT575E
Agricultural
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT575E vs Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS
Image not recorded
SchluterModel B
Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS
Utility
- power
- 200 hp
- displacement
- 419 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT575E
vs
SchluterSchluter Euro Trac 2000 LS
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT575E higher · +40 hp (+20%)MT575E240 hp
Euro Trac 2000 LS200 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT575E is in the 87th percentile; Euro Trac 2000 LS is in the 81st · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT575E higher · +30 ci (+7%)MT575E449 ci
Euro Trac 2000 LS419 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT575E is in the 79th percentile; Euro Trac 2000 LS is in the 74th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT575E6
Euro Trac 2000 LS6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT575E is in the 74th percentile; Euro Trac 2000 LS is in the 74th · 1,130 models
MT575E (A)Euro Trac 2000 LS (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Schluter | — |
| Model | MT575E | Euro Trac 2000 LS | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | MAN | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D 0826 LUE 501 | — |
| Power Output | 240hp | 200hp | ▲ MT575E+40 hp · +20% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Euro Trac 2000 LS+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 449ci | 419ci | ▲ MT575E+30 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ Euro Trac 2000 LS+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 4.9in | ▲ MT575E+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 211in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 122in | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Schluter Euro Trac 2000 LS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 87th percentile (240 hp)B · 81st percentile (200 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 79th percentile (449 ci)B · 74th percentile (419 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
A · MT575EB · Euro Trac 2000 LSMedian Agricultural Tractor