Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT200 vs Challenger MT735
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT735
Articulated
- power
- 235 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO DT200
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT735
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedDT200235 hp
MT735235 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT200 is in the 85th percentile; MT735 is in the 85th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT735 higher · +32 ci (+6%)DT200505 ci
MT735537 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT200 is in the 89th percentile; MT735 is in the 94th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT2006
MT7356
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT200 is in the 50th percentile; MT735 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ DT200 higher · +2 (+13%)DT20018
MT73516
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT200 is in the 61st percentile; MT735 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
DT200 (A)MT735 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | DT200 | MT735 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | C8.3 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 235hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ DT200+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 537ci | ▲ MT735+32 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.4in | ▲ DT200+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.9in | ▲ MT735+0.6 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 98in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 121in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 19,700lb | 28,185lb | ▲ MT735+8,485 lb · +43% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/3N | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Hydraulic wet disc | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab Standard | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 85th percentile (235 hp)B · 85th percentile (235 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 94th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 84th percentile (19,700 lb)B · 97th percentile (28,185 lb)
A · DT200B · MT735Median Row Crop Tractor