Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT200 vs Fendt 826
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 826
Agricultural
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 370 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 4
AGCOAGCO DT200
vs
FendtFendt 826
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 826 higher · +5 hp (+2%)DT200235 hp
826240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT200 is in the 85th percentile; 826 is in the 86th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT200 higher · +135 ci (+36%)DT200505 ci
826370 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT200 is in the 89th percentile; 826 is in the 47th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT2006
8266
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT200 is in the 50th percentile; 826 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ DT200 higher · +14 (+350%)DT20018
8264
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT200 is in the 61st percentile; 826 is in the 4th · 1,200 models
DT200 (A)826 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 826 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Fendt | — |
| Model | DT200 | 826 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 826 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Not recorded | — |
| Model | C8.3 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 240hp | ▲ 826+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ DT200+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 370ci | ▲ DT200+135 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4in | ▲ DT200+0.5 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ DT200+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 826 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Continuously variable Vario transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 826 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | 208in | ▲ 826+5 in · +2% |
| Width | 98in | 101in | ▲ 826+3 in · +3% |
| Height | 121in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 19,700lb | 20,834lb | ▲ 826+1,134 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 826 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 826 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 826 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/3N | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | 11,307lb | ▲ DT200+7,693 lb · +68% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 826 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 826 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT200 | Fendt 826 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab Standard | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 85th percentile (235 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 47th percentile (370 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 84th percentile (19,700 lb)B · 86th percentile (20,834 lb)
A · DT200B · 826Median Row Crop Tractor