Head to head · Articulated

Challenger MT765B vs Fendt 826

Challenger MT765B Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT765B

Articulated

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765B specs
Image not recorded
FendtModel B

Fendt 826

Agricultural

power
240 hp
displacement
370 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
4
Full 826 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT765B
vs
FendtFendt 826

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated

n = 41–62

Engine Power

▲ MT765B higher · +81 hp (+34%)
MT765B321 hp
826240 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp

MT765B is in the 10th percentile; 826 is in the 2nd · 62 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT765B higher · +167 ci (+45%)
MT765B537 ci
826370 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci

MT765B is in the 1st percentile; 826 is in the 1st · 61 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT765B6
8266
Median Articulated Tractor6

MT765B is in the 50th percentile; 826 is in the 50th · 61 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT765B higher · +12 (+300%)
MT765B16
8264
Median Articulated Tractor16

MT765B is in the 50th percentile; 826 is in the 1st · 59 models

MT765B (A)826 (B)Median Articulated Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT765BFendt 826Difference
ManufacturerChallengerFendt—
ModelMT765B826—
CategoryArticulatedAgricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT765BFendt 826Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarNot recorded—
ModelC9 ACERT Tech Tier 3Not recorded—
Power Output321hp240hp▲ MT765B+81 hp · +34%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement537ci370ci▲ MT765B+167 ci · +45%
Bore4.4in4in▲ MT765B+0.4 in · +10%
Stroke5.9in5in▲ MT765B+0.9 in · +18%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT765BFendt 826Difference
TypePowerShiftContinuously variable Vario transmission—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT765BFendt 826Difference
Length233in208in▲ MT765B+25 in · +12%
Width88in101in▲ 826+13 in · +15%
Height136inNot recorded—
Operating Weight31,085lb20,834lb▲ MT765B+10,251 lb · +49%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT765BFendt 826Difference
System TypeClosed-center PFCNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT765BFendt 826Difference
Hitch TypeStandard Cat.3/3NNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryCategory 3Category 3Same
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity17,263lb11,307lb▲ MT765B+5,956 lb · +53%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT765BFendt 826Difference
Chassis TypeTracklayer-rubber trackedNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Brake TypeWet DiscNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT765BFendt 826Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT765BFendt 826Difference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 450 hp
A · 10th percentile (321 hp)B · 2nd percentile (240 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 827 ci
A · 1st percentile (537 ci)B · 1st percentile (370 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 1st percentile (4)

Operating Weight

median 51,335 lb
A · 4th percentile (31,085 lb)B · 1st percentile (20,834 lb)
A · MT765BB · 826Median Articulated Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT765BFull spec pageFendt 826