Head to head · Row Crop

AGCO DT200A vs Challenger MT735

Image not recorded
AGCOModel A

AGCO DT200A

Row Crop

power
235 hp
displacement
449 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full DT200A specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT735

Articulated

power
235 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT735 specs
AGCOAGCO DT200A
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT735

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,206–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
DT200A235 hp
MT735235 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

DT200A is in the 85th percentile; MT735 is in the 85th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT735 higher · +88 ci (+20%)
DT200A449 ci
MT735537 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

DT200A is in the 77th percentile; MT735 is in the 94th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
DT200A6
MT7356
Median Row Crop Tractor6

DT200A is in the 50th percentile; MT735 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT735 higher · +9,049 lb (+47%)
DT200A19,136 lb
MT73528,185 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

DT200A is in the 82nd percentile; MT735 is in the 97th · 1,350 models

DT200A (A)MT735 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAGCO DT200AChallenger MT735Difference
ManufacturerAGCOChallenger—
ModelDT200AMT735—
CategoryRow CropArticulated—

Engine

SpecAGCO DT200AChallenger MT735Difference
ManufacturerSisu DieselCaterpillar—
ModelSisu DieselNot recorded—
Power Output235hp235hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPM▲ DT200A+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement449ci537ci▲ MT735+88 ci · +20%
Bore4.3in4.4in▲ MT735+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.3in5.9in▲ MT735+0.6 in · +11%

Transmission

SpecAGCO DT200AChallenger MT735Difference
TypeContinuously variable transmission (CVT)Full power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAGCO DT200AChallenger MT735Difference
Length206inNot recorded—
Height122inNot recorded—
Operating Weight19,136lb28,185lb▲ MT735+9,049 lb · +47%

Hydraulics

SpecAGCO DT200AChallenger MT735Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)Not recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerElectro-hydraulic—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecAGCO DT200AChallenger MT735Difference
TypeIndependentNot recorded—
Speed 1540rpmNot recorded—
Speed 21,000rpmNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAGCO DT200AChallenger MT735Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIIIIIISame
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch Capacity14,400lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAGCO DT200AChallenger MT735Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerElectro-hydraulic—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discHydraulic wet discSame

Electrical

SpecAGCO DT200AChallenger MT735Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecAGCO DT200AChallenger MT735Difference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 85th percentile (235 hp)B · 85th percentile (235 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 77th percentile (449 ci)B · 94th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 82nd percentile (19,136 lb)B · 97th percentile (28,185 lb)
A · DT200AB · MT735Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageAGCO DT200AFull spec pageChallenger MT735