Image not recorded
AGCOModel A
AGCO DT205B
Row Crop
- power
- 242 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT205B vs Challenger MT575E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT575E
Agricultural
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO DT205B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT575E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ DT205B higher · +2 hp (<1%)DT205B242 hp
MT575E240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT205B is in the 86th percentile; MT575E is in the 86th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT205B higher · +64 ci (+14%)DT205B513 ci
MT575E449 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT205B is in the 92nd percentile; MT575E is in the 77th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT205B6
MT575E6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT205B is in the 50th percentile; MT575E is in the 50th · 1,417 models
DT205B (A)MT575E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT205B | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | DT205B | MT575E | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT205B | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | 84CTA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 242hp | 240hp | ▲ DT205B+2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ DT205B+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 449ci | ▲ DT205B+64 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ DT205B+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.3in | ▲ DT205B+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT205B | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT205B | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 216in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 141in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 25,840lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT205B | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing | Closed-center load sensing | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 49.5gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 3,190psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT205B | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Optional front and independent rear with electro-hydraulic clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT205B | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/4 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 26,460lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT205B | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | MFWD - Mechanical Front Wheel Drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT205B | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT205B | Challenger MT575E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab standard with heat and air-conditioning | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 86th percentile (242 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 92nd percentile (513 ci)B · 77th percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
A · DT205BB · MT575EMedian Row Crop Tractor