Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT225 vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
AGCOAGCO DT225
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +60 hp (+27%)DT225225 hp
65C285 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT225 is in the 83rd percentile; 65C is in the 92nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +133 ci (+26%)DT225505 ci
65C638 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT225 is in the 89th percentile; 65C is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT2256
65C6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT225 is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ DT225 higher · +8 (+80%)DT22518
65C10
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT225 is in the 61st percentile; 65C is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
DT225 (A)65C (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT225 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | DT225 | 65C | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT225 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | C8.3L | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 225hp | 285hp | ▲ 65C+60 hp · +27% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ DT225+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 638ci | ▲ 65C+133 ci · +26% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.8in | ▲ 65C+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 6in | ▲ 65C+0.7 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT225 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT225 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | 232in | ▲ 65C+29 in · +14% |
| Width | 98in | 120in | ▲ 65C+22 in · +22% |
| Height | 121in | 128in | ▲ 65C+7 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 19,700lb | 32,875lb | ▲ 65C+13,175 lb · +67% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT225 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT225 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT225 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/3N | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,005lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT225 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | MFWD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT225 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO DT225 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT225 | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 83rd percentile (225 hp)B · 92nd percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 98th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 84th percentile (19,700 lb)B · 99th percentile (32,875 lb)
A · DT225B · 65CMedian Row Crop Tractor