ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs John Deere 9400T
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9400T
Crawler
- power
- 347 hp
- displacement
- 765 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9400T
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 9400T higher · +62 hp (+22%)65C285 hp
9400T347 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 9400T is in the 71st · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9400T higher · +127 ci (+20%)65C638 ci
9400T765 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 9400T is in the 78th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
9400T6
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 9400T is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9400T higher · +14 (+140%)65C10
9400T24
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 9400T is in the 94th · 179 models
65C (A)9400T (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | 65C | 9400T | — |
| Category | Crawler | Crawler | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 347hp | ▲ 9400T+62 hp · +22% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 765ci | ▲ 9400T+127 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 5in | ▲ 9400T+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 6in | 6.5in | ▲ 9400T+0.5 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 42,620lb | ▲ 9400T+9,745 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 9400T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 71st percentile (347 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 78th percentile (765 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 94th percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 82nd percentile (42,620 lb)
A · 65CB · 9400TMedian Crawler Tractor