Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT55 vs Volvo 2200
Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT55
vs
VolvoVolvo 2200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedGT5556 hp
220056 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT55 is in the 51st percentile; 2200 is in the 51st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2200 higher · +53 ci (+29%)GT55183 ci
2200236 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT55 is in the 50th percentile; 2200 is in the 64th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 2200 higher · +1 (+33%)GT553
22004
Median Utility Tractor4
GT55 is in the 23rd percentile; 2200 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT5516
220016
Median Utility Tractor12
GT55 is in the 73rd percentile; 2200 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT55 (A)2200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Volvo | — |
| Model | GT55 | 2200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Volvo | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D39T | — |
| Power Output | 56hp | 56hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 2200+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 183ci | 236ci | ▲ 2200+53 ci · +29% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT55+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 2200+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Synchromesh and two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 146in | Same |
| Width | 70.4in | 73.6in | ▲ 2200+3.2 in · +5% |
| Height | 105in | 100in | ▲ GT55+5 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 6,225lb | 6,493lb | ▲ 2200+268 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT55 | Volvo 2200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 51st percentile (56 hp)B · 51st percentile (56 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 50th percentile (183 ci)B · 64th percentile (236 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 59th percentile (6,225 lb)B · 61st percentile (6,493 lb)
A · GT55B · 2200Median Utility Tractor