Image not recorded
AGCOModel A
AGCO GT55A
Utility
- power
- 58.9 hp
- displacement
- 183 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT55A vs Challenger MT315B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT315B
Utility
- power
- 58 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO GT55A
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT315B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT55A higher · +0.9 hp (+2%)GT55A58.9 hp
MT315B58 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT55A is in the 52nd percentile; MT315B is in the 52nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT315B higher · +18 ci (+10%)GT55A183 ci
MT315B201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT55A is in the 50th percentile; MT315B is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT55A higher · +4 (+33%)GT55A16
MT315B12
Median Utility Tractor12
GT55A is in the 73rd percentile; MT315B is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT315B higher · +214 lb (+3%)GT55A6,400 lb
MT315B6,614 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT55A is in the 61st percentile; MT315B is in the 63rd · 5,107 models
GT55A (A)MT315B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Challenger MT315B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | GT55A | MT315B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Challenger MT315B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Challenger | — |
| Power Output | 58.9hp | 58hp | ▲ GT55A+0.9 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,150RPM | ▲ GT55A+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Displacement | 183ci | 201ci | ▲ MT315B+18 ci · +10% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Challenger MT315B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 16-speed transmission | Synchronized Shuttle / Power Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Challenger MT315B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 148in | ▲ MT315B+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 70.8in | 76in | ▲ MT315B+5.2 in · +7% |
| Height | 104in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,400lb | 6,614lb | ▲ MT315B+214 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Challenger MT315B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Challenger MT315B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Challenger MT315B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I/II | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,802lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Challenger MT315B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Challenger MT315B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT55A | Challenger MT315B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab, ROPS | Cab / ROPS available | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 52nd percentile (58.9 hp)B · 52nd percentile (58 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 50th percentile (183 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 61st percentile (6,400 lb)B · 63rd percentile (6,614 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 62nd percentile (146 in)B · 64th percentile (148 in)
A · GT55AB · MT315BMedian Utility Tractor