Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Belarus Agross 526HX
BelarusModel B
Belarus Agross 526HX
Utility
- power
- 72 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
BelarusBelarus Agross 526HX
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Agross 526HX higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
Agross 526HX72 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; Agross 526HX is in the 65th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Agross 526HX higher · +46 ci (+19%)GT65244 ci
Agross 526HX290 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; Agross 526HX is in the 83rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
Agross 526HX4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; Agross 526HX is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Agross 526HX higher · +2 (+13%)GT6516
Agross 526HX18
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; Agross 526HX is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)Agross 526HX (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Belarus Agross 526HX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Belarus | — |
| Model | GT65 | Agross 526HX | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Belarus Agross 526HX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 72hp | ▲ Agross 526HX+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,950RPM | ▲ GT65+250 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 290ci | ▲ Agross 526HX+46 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ Agross 526HX+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.9in | ▲ Agross 526HX+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Belarus Agross 526HX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Belarus Agross 526HX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 159in | ▲ Agross 526HX+7 in · +5% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 111in | ▲ Agross 526HX+5 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 8,600lb | ▲ Agross 526HX+3,265 lb · +61% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Belarus Agross 526HX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Belarus Agross 526HX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Belarus Agross 526HX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Belarus Agross 526HX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Belarus Agross 526HX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 65th percentile (72 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 83rd percentile (290 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 80th percentile (8,600 lb)
A · GT65B · Agross 526HXMedian Utility Tractor