Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs CaseIH 795
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
CaseIHCaseIH 795
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 795 higher · +6 hp (+8%)GT6571 hp
79577 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 795 is in the 69th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 795 higher · +2 ci (<1%)GT65244 ci
795246 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 795 is in the 69th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
7954
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 795 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
79516
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 795 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)795 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH 795 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | GT65 | 795 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH 795 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | CaseIH | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D-246 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 77hp | ▲ 795+6 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 795+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 246ci | ▲ 795+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5.1in | ▲ 795+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH 795 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH 795 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 148in | ▲ GT65+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 104in | ▲ GT65+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,376lb | ▲ 795+1,041 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH 795 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH 795 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH 795 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH 795 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH 795 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 69th percentile (77 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 69th percentile (246 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 60th percentile (6,376 lb)
A · GT65B · 795Median Utility Tractor