Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs CaseIH C70
Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
CaseIHCaseIH C70
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
C7070 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; C70 is in the 63rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +54 ci (+28%)GT65244 ci
C70190 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; C70 is in the 51st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT65 higher · +1 (+33%)GT654
C703
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; C70 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +8 (+100%)GT6516
C708
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; C70 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)C70 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH C70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | GT65 | C70 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH C70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Steyr | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1004.42 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 70hp | ▲ GT65+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 190ci | ▲ GT65+54 ci · +28% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ C70+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH C70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | 8-Speed | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH C70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 150in | ▲ GT65+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 94.9in | ▲ GT65+11.1 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 5,941lb | ▲ C70+606 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH C70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH C70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH C70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH C70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH C70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.2gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH C70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 63rd percentile (70 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 51st percentile (190 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 56th percentile (5,941 lb)
A · GT65B · C70Median Utility Tractor