Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs CaseIH CS 68
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH CS 68
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 190 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
CaseIHCaseIH CS 68
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
CS 6868 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; CS 68 is in the 61st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +54 ci (+28%)GT65244 ci
CS 68190 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; CS 68 is in the 51st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT65 higher · +1 (+33%)GT654
CS 683
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; CS 68 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
CS 6816
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; CS 68 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)CS 68 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 68 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | GT65 | CS 68 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 68 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | MWM | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3.1L 3-cyl diesel | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 68hp | ▲ GT65+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ CS 68+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 190ci | ▲ GT65+54 ci · +28% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ CS 68+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 68 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 68 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 146in | ▲ GT65+6 in · +4% |
| Width | 76.7in | 74.8in | ▲ GT65+1.9 in · +3% |
| Height | 106in | 99.2in | ▲ GT65+6.8 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,217lb | ▲ CS 68+882 lb · +17% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 68 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 68 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Type II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 68 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 68 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 68 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 61st percentile (68 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 51st percentile (190 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,217 lb)
A · GT65B · CS 68Median Utility Tractor