Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs CaseIH CS 75
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH CS 75
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
CaseIHCaseIH CS 75
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CS 75 higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
CS 7575 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; CS 75 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +43 ci (+21%)GT65244 ci
CS 75201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; CS 75 is in the 54th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT65 higher · +1 (+33%)GT654
CS 753
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; CS 75 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
CS 7516
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; CS 75 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)CS 75 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | GT65 | CS 75 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | MWM/Sisu | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3.1L 3-cyl diesel | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ CS 75+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ CS 75+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 201ci | ▲ GT65+43 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ CS 75+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ CS 75+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 149in | ▲ GT65+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 6,834lb | ▲ CS 75+1,499 lb · +28% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH CS 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 54th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)
A · GT65B · CS 75Median Utility Tractor