Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs CaseIH Farmall 80N
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 80N
Agricultural
- power
- 74 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 80N
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 80N higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
Farmall 80N74 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; Farmall 80N is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +37 ci (+18%)GT65244 ci
Farmall 80N207 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; Farmall 80N is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
Farmall 80N4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 80N is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT6516
Farmall 80N16
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; Farmall 80N is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)Farmall 80N (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | GT65 | Farmall 80N | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 74hp | ▲ Farmall 80N+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 80N+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 207ci | ▲ GT65+37 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 96in | ▲ GT65+56 in · +58% |
| Width | 76.7in | 52.9in | ▲ GT65+23.8 in · +45% |
| Height | 106in | 90in | ▲ GT65+16 in · +18% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 5,300lb | ▲ GT65+35 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 6 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 80N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (74 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 57th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 50th percentile (5,300 lb)
A · GT65B · Farmall 80NMedian Utility Tractor