Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Chamberlain 306
ChamberlainModel B
Chamberlain 306
Utility
- power
- 70 hp
- displacement
- 306 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 9
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
ChamberlainChamberlain 306
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
30670 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 306 is in the 63rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 306 higher · +62 ci (+25%)GT65244 ci
306306 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 306 is in the 85th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 306 higher · +2 (+50%)GT654
3066
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 306 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +7 (+78%)GT6516
3069
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 306 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)306 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Chamberlain 306 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Chamberlain | — |
| Model | GT65 | 306 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Chamberlain 306 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 6.306 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 70hp | ▲ GT65+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ GT65+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 306+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 306ci | ▲ 306+62 ci · +25% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.6in | ▲ GT65+0.5 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 306+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Chamberlain 306 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Chamberlain 306 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Chamberlain 306 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Chamberlain 306 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Chamberlain 306 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Chamberlain 306 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Chamberlain 306 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 63rd percentile (70 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 85th percentile (306 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 35th percentile (9)
A · GT65B · 306Median Utility Tractor