Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Fendt 370GT
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
FendtFendt 370GT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 370GT higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
370GT75 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 370GT is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 370GT higher · +5 ci (+2%)GT65244 ci
370GT249 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 370GT is in the 70th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
370GT4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 370GT is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 370GT higher · +5 (+31%)GT6516
370GT21
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 370GT is in the 88th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)370GT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Fendt | — |
| Model | GT65 | 370GT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | KHD | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ 370GT+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 370GT+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 249ci | ▲ 370GT+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4in | ▲ GT65+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 370GT+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 182in | ▲ 370GT+30 in · +20% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 107in | ▲ 370GT+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 7,915lb | ▲ 370GT+2,580 lb · +48% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt 370GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 70th percentile (249 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 88th percentile (21)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 75th percentile (7,915 lb)
A · GT65B · 370GTMedian Utility Tractor