Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Ford 555D
Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
FordFord 555D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 555D higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
555D72 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 555D is in the 65th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 555D higher · +12 ci (+5%)GT65244 ci
555D256 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 555D is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
555D4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 555D is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +12 (+300%)GT6516
555D4
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 555D is in the 4th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)555D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 555D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Ford | — |
| Model | GT65 | 555D | — |
| Category | Utility | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 555D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Ford | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 72hp | ▲ 555D+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 256ci | ▲ 555D+12 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.4in | ▲ 555D+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.2in | ▲ GT65+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 555D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 555D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 275in | ▲ 555D+123 in · +81% |
| Width | 76.7in | 89in | ▲ 555D+12.3 in · +16% |
| Height | 106in | 108in | ▲ 555D+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 555D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 555D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 555D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 555D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 555D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.7gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 555D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Four-post ROPS/FOPS or Cab (optional) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 65th percentile (72 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 73rd percentile (256 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 4th percentile (4)
Length
median 137 inA · 67th percentile (152 in)B · 98th percentile (275 in)
A · GT65B · 555DMedian Utility Tractor