Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Ford 5900
Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
FordFord 5900
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5900 higher · +2 hp (+3%)GT6571 hp
590073 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 5900 is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5900 higher · +12 ci (+5%)GT65244 ci
5900256 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 5900 is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
59004
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 5900 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +8 (+100%)GT6516
59008
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 5900 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)5900 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 5900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Ford | — |
| Model | GT65 | 5900 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 5900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 73hp | ▲ 5900+2 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ GT65+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 256ci | ▲ 5900+12 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.4in | ▲ 5900+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.2in | ▲ GT65+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 5900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Sliding gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 5900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 146in | ▲ GT65+6 in · +4% |
| Width | 76.7in | 76.9in | ▲ 5900+0.2 in · <1% |
| Height | 106in | 94in | ▲ GT65+12 in · +13% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 5,760lb | ▲ 5900+425 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 5900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 5900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 5900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,340lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 5900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 5900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 5900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Ford 5900 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Two-post fixed ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (73 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 73rd percentile (256 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,760 lb)
A · GT65B · 5900Median Utility Tractor